At the end of the book, however, and by way of conclusion, he attempts to demonstrate the falsity of the "commonly accepted" picture of the Western way of war (Victor Davis Hanson's) by presenting evidence of intervention by the supernatural, taking of slaves, rape of women, and mass execution of captives by Roman soldiers, as depicted on the column of Marcus Aurelius. At the opening of the book, he disingenuously presents his interest in the "western way of war" as a neutral appraisal of its use as a social construct originating with Herodotus. Sidebottom reviews methods of warfare as conducted by the Romans and ancient Greeks. He also explores the ways in which ancient society thought about conflict: Can a war be just? Why was siege warfare particularly bloody? What role did divine intervention play in the outcome of a battle? Taking fascinating examples from the Iliad, Tacitus, and the Persian Wars, Sidebottom uses arresting anecdotes to show that any understanding of ancient war is an ongoing process of interpretation.
Sidebottom examines war in the wider context, showing how wars were able to shape classical society and how an individual's identity was sometimes constructed by war, as in the case of the Christian soldier fighting in God's name. Here, Harry Sidebottom looks at how this Western Way of War was constructed and maintained by the Greeks and Romans and why this concept is so prevalent today.Īll aspects of ancient warfare are thoroughly examined - from philosophy and strategy to the technical skills needed to fight. The key difference is often held to be that the Greeks and Romans practiced a "Western Way of War", in which the aim is an open, decisive battle - won by courage instilled, in part, by discipline. Greek and Roman warfare was unlike that of any other culture before or since.
0 kommentar(er)
